Enterprise Architecture Content That Drives Real Value – Here's What It Takes
Uncovering Enterprise Architecture Benefit Realization – Part 3
In an earlier article, I wrote about how enterprise architecture (EA) only creates value when it is actively used—in planning, decision-making, development, and governance. But there’s a simple truth behind that idea: EA doesn’t create impact through ideas or conversations alone. You also need real, usable architecture content.
You can’t do EA just by talking. You also need tangible outputs—capability maps, application views, roadmaps, target states—that help others see what you mean and make better decisions as a result.
High-quality architecture content is a critical link in the EA value chain. Without it, EA work stalls. Models are ignored, decisions are made without structure, and alignment breaks down. So, what does “quality” really mean when it comes to architecture content?
1 Available and Usable
Let’s start with the basics: if no one can find or access your content, it might as well not exist. Unfortunately, this is more common than it should be. Models live in obscure repositories, filenames are cryptic, and even experienced architects struggle to locate the latest version.
It’s not enough to have the right content somewhere. It needs to be available in the right place, at the right time, and in a form people can actually use. That usually means going beyond modeling tools. Leadership wants curated slides, planners want summaries, developers want just the parts that are relevant. And no one wants to dig through a network drive with 200 diagrams named like “draft_v7_copy_final.”
Navigation matters. So does publication. Identify what types of content are most needed—roadmaps, capability maps, application views—and make those easy to find and apply.
2 Clear Enough to Read
Even excellent content becomes useless if it’s not readable. This is where many architecture models fail. Too many elements, too many lines, too many colors, or just a layout that looks like it came out of a random diagram generator.
Architecture should prioritize clarity. That means limiting element types per view, organizing layout visually, and using consistent styles. If the model is hard to read on a single slide or screen, it’s probably too complex for most audiences.
It also means simplifying when needed. Not everything needs to be shown at once. Divide content into several diagrams, build layers, hide technical details where they’re not needed, and offer different versions for different stakeholders.
3 Consistent, Structured, and Coherent
Another key dimension of quality is consistency—both visual and structural. This applies on multiple levels: consistent naming, logical levels of detail, and a coherent structure across all EA content. Capabilities shouldn’t be connected differently in every diagram. Application elements shouldn’t appear under multiple names. The same type of diagram should follow the same logic throughout.
Achieving this kind of consistency doesn’t happen by accident, and it’s not enough to just reference a modeling language like ArchiMate or a general methodology. You need to actively design and document your modeling approach: define what types of diagrams are used for what purpose, what content each view should include, how elements are named and categorized, and how relationships are modeled. In short: create modeling guidelines, and stick to them.
This isn’t just about professionalism, it’s about usability. Inconsistent content quickly loses trust. And once trust is gone, your models won’t be used, no matter how solid the logic behind them might be.
4 The Right Level of Detail
The correct level of detail and abstraction depend on the use case. A senior leadership deck needs a different view than a solution design session. But in general, EA content should stay at a high enough level to offer overview, alignment, and decision support—not micro-detail.
Too much detail, too soon, kills both clarity and engagement. Stakeholders get lost in irrelevant elements, and the real message gets buried. If deep modeling is needed (for example, in solution architecture), do it in separate diagrams. And always offer a simpler view alongside.
5 Accurate and Maintained
Let’s not forget that models must also reflect reality. Outdated or incorrect content is worse than no content—because it misleads. And while EA will never be “done,” it must be up to date enough to support real planning.
Accuracy comes from reliable data sources, collaboration with stakeholders, clear versioning, and most importantly: ownership. Every diagram or model needs a named person who is responsible for keeping it relevant. Ownership doesn’t mean modeling everything personally—it means being accountable for quality and usability (more about this in an earlier article).
You can also automate some parts of this. For example, syncing key attributes from ITSM tools helps keep application elements current. But most of the content still requires human judgment and attention.
6 Fit for Purpose
Ultimately, architecture content exists to support decisions, prioritization, and coordination. That means it must be tailored to the context and question at hand. Who’s the audience? What do they need to decide? What’s the simplest, clearest view that can support that?
In practice, this often means creating multiple versions of the same content: one for planning, one for execution, one for steering groups. It also means documenting the purpose of each model clearly. If a diagram has no clear use case, it probably shouldn’t exist.
Conclusion: Quality Enables Impact
Without useful content, EA is just effort without output. Architecture content is what connects the thinking to the doing—the bridge between ideas and execution.
So, if you want your EA to deliver value, invest in the quality of your models. Make them readable, usable, consistent, and relevant. Maintain them regularly, give them clear owners, and make sure they’re present in the conversations that shape your organization.
Otherwise, all your hard work may simply gather digital dust.
📬 Want more practical EA guidance? Subscribe for weekly articles on making EA useful, impactful, and real.
Good guidelines to obtain useful EA content. Some suggestions to topics raised:
Solution to 1: Publish automatically from the tool in different formats and with different content depending on readers needs to locations that can easily accessed (e.g. URL by any browser).
Solution to 2: Show results in different level of details and content (the same as in solution #1, e.g. details to architects, basics for public web etc.)
Solution to 3: Use language with proper metamodel. For example, if language provides 8 connection types to connect two elements the likelihood that they are applied in-consistently is high – even if the same person created them all. Or if language allows creating duplicates, unnamed, inheriting from itself etc. (Unfortunately all above inconsistences can be made easily with the mentioned ArchiMate).
Solution to 4: as above #1 and #2. Different level of detail and views – kept consistent automatically as much as possible (so not duplicates etc as in #3).